STIGNING

Institutional Engineering Lab

Engineering Critical Infrastructure Under Adversarial Conditions

STIGNING is an independent engineering firm specialized in security-critical distributed systems, post-quantum cryptographic infrastructure, protocol engineering, secure IIoT communication, and resilient backend platforms.

Program History

Selected organizations from prior engineering programs.

FitBank logo
CloudWalk logo
Hilab logo
CargoX logo
Unico logo
Pyminers logo
Indacoin logo
Egor Technologies logo
Feats Off logo
Human logo
FitBank logo
CloudWalk logo
Hilab logo
CargoX logo
Unico logo
Pyminers logo
Indacoin logo
Egor Technologies logo
Feats Off logo
Human logo

01

Institutional Scope

System integrity under adversarial and operational pressure

Engagements are structured for organizations where correctness, cryptographic posture, and operational continuity are mandatory system properties.

Constraint Pillar

Correctness

System behavior remains consistent under expected and degraded operating conditions.

Constraint Pillar

Cryptographic Integrity

Identity, transport, and key lifecycle controls are enforced across service boundaries.

Constraint Pillar

Operational Survivability

Infrastructure retains controllability during incident response and partial compromise.

02

Core Domains

Institutional engineering modules

Domain work is delivered as system modules with explicit constraints and controls.

Institutional Domain

Post-Quantum Infrastructure

Migration architecture for hybrid trust models across service identity and transport.

  • Hybrid handshake compatibility planning
  • Certificate and key lifecycle redesign
  • Downgrade resistance validation

Institutional Domain

Distributed Systems Architecture

Fault-aware system design for correctness and availability under partial failure.

  • Consistency and partition strategy design
  • Replica recovery and convergence patterns
  • Failure propagation control

Institutional Domain

Blockchain Protocol Engineering

Specification-aligned protocol implementation and production hardening.

  • Deterministic state transition testing
  • Consensus edge-case analysis
  • Validator operations hardening

Institutional Domain

Secure IIoT Systems

Device identity and secure communication architecture for constrained fleets.

  • Provisioning trust boundary design
  • Authenticated transport and messaging
  • Firmware integrity controls

Institutional Domain

High-Performance Backend Platforms

Low-latency backend engineering for critical execution and data paths.

  • Tail-latency stabilization
  • Concurrency and backpressure architecture
  • Performance telemetry design

Institutional Domain

Mission-Critical DevSecOps

Secure delivery and runtime governance for high-assurance systems.

  • Reproducible and signed build pipelines
  • Policy-as-code enforcement
  • Immutable rollout and rollback control

03

Systems Statement

Resilience is engineered at system level

Infrastructure is treated as an integrated stack of protocol behavior, identity, telemetry, and incident controls. Validation includes degraded-state operation and adversarial misuse scenarios.

Operational behavior under stress

Design assumptions are tested against network instability, dependency failure, and hostile interaction models. Architecture quality is measured by control retention, not nominal throughput alone.

04

Research Alignment

Architecture-informed technical briefs

Research outputs are developed as engineering artifacts to support architecture review, migration planning, and hardening decisions.

Brief

Threat Surface Notes

Structured analysis patterns for distributed attack surfaces and operational choke points.

Brief

PQ Migration Architecture

Reference migration sequencing for hybrid cryptographic posture in production systems.

Brief

Protocol Hardening Methods

Implementation controls for protocol integrity, observability, and deterministic runtime behavior.

05

Collaboration Model

Delivery sequence

Collaboration is structured to preserve technical control, verification depth, and operational continuity throughout program delivery.

  1. Step 01

    Qualification

    Initial fit assessment based on system criticality, risk profile, and stakeholder readiness.

  2. Step 02

    Baseline Architecture

    Constraint mapping and architecture review to define scope, risk, and delivery sequence.

  3. Step 03

    Implementation Program

    Targeted engineering delivery across protocol, security, and reliability control surfaces.

  4. Step 04

    Assurance & Transition

    Verification, operational handover, and long-term sustainability controls.

06

Programs & Outcomes

Programs with scope clarity and measurable outcomes

Engagement planning is anchored in explicit scope and measurable engineering outcomes. Offer programs define delivery boundaries while anonymized case studies provide operational evidence.

Offer Programs

Commercially scoped engineering tracks

  • Architecture Review
  • Protocol Hardening
  • PQ Migration Program
  • DevSecOps Assurance
View Offerings

Case Evidence

Anonymized results from production programs

  • Authorization latency p95: -59.8%
  • Signing incident MTTR: -77.4%
  • Partition recovery time: -77.8%
  • Control coverage: +34 pp
View Case Studies